North Antrim Community Network
 
 
 
photo gallery
moyle rural
programme

 

 


Policy context

The importance of community participation in health and social care has been recognised for some time.  The declaration of Alma Ata recognised "people have the right and duty to participate individually and collectively in their health service" (the Alma Ata Conference on Primary Healthcare 1978). The World Health Organisation Strategy ‘Health for All by the Year 2000’ (1985), to which the UK Government is a signatory, gave further prominence to the idea of community participation in health, where it was highlighted as one of three key principles to promote health, the others being equality and inter-sectoral working.  Promoting social inclusion has also been an important feature of European Policy directives and initiatives eg the European Structural Fund and the Special Support Programme for Peace and Reconciliation which have emphasised the importance of social inclusion as a major goal.

 

The same themes are evidenced in more recent policy initiatives at local level. The Government’s Targeting Social Need (TSN) initiative aims to address disadvantage across a range of issues by targeting resources to areas of greatest disadvantage, whilst the Children (NI) Order 1995 aims to 'safeguard and promote the welfare of children'.  The Department of Health and Social Services Regional Strategy 1997-2002 Health and Wellbeing: Into the Next Millennium, places clear priority on the goal of addressing inequalities in health and wellbeing.  In this regard community development and community sensitive approaches to the commissioning of health and social care are highlighted as important mechanisms.  More recently in December 1997 the present Government reaffirmed and renewed this commitment in ‘Well Into 2000’ which further highlighted the need to tackle inequalities and promote health and social wellbeing.  The Government’s Targeting Health and Social Need Initiative was re-launched in March 1998 and highlights the need to target social need and promote social inclusion in Northern Ireland.

 

Promoting social inclusion, addressing inequalities in health and wellbeing and increasing community participation in health and social care demands new approaches.  Communities require support if they are to be able to truly participate actively as partners in shaping health and social care issues.  Community development is one important method of promoting health.  It is a way of tackling a community’s problem using the energy and leadership of the people who live there (Thomas, 1995). The empowerment which results is a fundamental building block for health and increases the likelihood of people actively participating in matters relating to their own health.  This promotes self reliance, rather than compliance, and is based on a commitment to change, a redistribution of power and the clear goal of empowerment (Black, 1998).

 

The Board’s mission requires a locally sensitive approach to commissioning.  Its mission is to:

§         "promote the health and social wellbeing of its resident population;

§         inform people of the challenges and issues that health and personal social services have to face in the maintenance and development of services and the allocation of resources;

§         involve local people in discussion on health and social services matters so that their views can be taken into account when the Board makes policy and planning decisions;

§         secure a balanced range of health and social care services to the highest standard within available resources, taking account of the professional guidance and best practice to meet the specific needs of the community".

The views of service users have been acknowledged by the Board as an essential element to service development.  However, there is a need to broaden such involvement and to develop mechanisms whereby local views and opinions can be used to shape the pattern overall of services developed to meet needs on a local basis. In developing such approaches emphasis must be placed on partnerships – with local people, communities, and the voluntary and statutory sectors where there is greatest potential influence on health and wellbeing.

The health service reforms initiated in 1989 and introduced in Northern Ireland in 1992, required Boards to act as ‘purchaser’ of services from Trusts, as ‘providers’ to meet the needs of its resident population.  In 1994 Circular HSS/PPRD5 7/94 clarified the role of Boards in relation to their local communities "Boards must continue to develop locally sensitive purchasing agreements … be able to demonstrate that they are taking systematic action to seek and act on the views of Health and Social Services Councils, GPs, voluntary organisations, the wider public and their representatives throughout the purchasing process … involving trying to establish local legitimacy for Board priorities and purchasing intentions .. to go that extra mile to explain their proposals, to take account of people’s concerns and to carry the public with them".  This guidance remains extant and the new Government has reiterated the need to maintain a separation between commissioning and providing, though in a much more collaborative than market-based relationship.  It is within this Policy environment that the Community Commissioning Partnership was established in 1998. Alongside this has been the development of the Northern Health and Social Services Board’s community development strategy.  Together with Provider Trusts, the aim of the strategy is to support and expand community development initiatives within the Board’s area.  In addition, is the development of the Children Services Planning process which places emphasis on the active participation of community, voluntary and other statutory sectors in developing an effective Children Services Plan which aims to address the needs of those young people most vulnerable and in greatest need.

homepage | Summary | Introduction | Policy Context | Model

Findings: Health and social wellbeing | Structure and decision making | Confidence | Access and contact | Influencing decisions | Information flow | Changes in structure

Analysis | Implications for the Project| Appendix 1 - Questionnaire
| Appendix 2 - Respondents